Back to EV’s – What’s stopping everyone from buying one?

Standard

Well it seems a lot of people are buying them – Nissan has sold 158,000 Leaf’s worldwide, which might not be huge numbers but for an electric car that makes it the best selling model in the world.

But for everyone else who hasn’t bought one yet what’s the issue? Well for some it’s simply that they are too new and therefore too expensive at the present time, the Leaf has only been in production since 2011. If you shop in the £1000-£3000 car market as I have done for most of my life, there aren’t any EV’s for sale.

If however price is not the limiting factor then for most people range almost certainly is. My leaf is supposed to be able to do 124 miles on a charge. However as anyone who has ever owned a car has found out, especially if they bought it because it was meant to be very economical, these figures are produced in a facility where the temperature is perfect, the rollers under the wheels are perfectly smooth and the wheels only turn at a constant (low) speed. In reality my 3 year old car does 80 miles on a full charge and around 60 miles on an 80% charge (which is recommended to maintain battery longevity).

Why is the range 80 miles? It seems that the range a Leaf was designed to do was based on Nissan data showing that average journeys are nearly always under 100 miles. This is explained very nicely and diagrammatically in a documentary about EV battery tech https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OtfKux9BUnE (there are lots of other interesting things in there as well).Daily distance car distribution

Here is a similar graph.

Long journeys are very uncommon.

 

One Leaftalk forum member Scott has devised a clever website https://evstatus.com/ which downloads (with users permission) data from their cars and shows the average journey distance from a pool of a hundred or so Leaf drivers to be 8.1 miles or 10% of the real world range of a Leaf!

This way of thinking was in one sense very accurate and the experience of Leaf drivers matches this scientific and statistical way of specifying the range needed. It is enough for most people to make it perfectly viable. Everyone who now owns a Leaf worried about range before buying the car and then found it be just fine once they went out driving in it. However a lot of the current owners are early adopters. Nissan though failed to take into account the human factor, when you’re coming from a fossil fuel car, the range feels low and some people make a lot of journeys in a given day even if they are short ones.

So whilst a range of 80-100 miles is actually quite enough for nearly everyone (and really not a problem if adequate reliable charging facilities are available such as your own garage/driveway), those who are anxious about range would be more comfortable with 300 miles and this is why Tesla’s Model S has this range. It’s a case of science/statistics versus human psychology/existing norms.

So what are the alternatives? Buy a Model S – fine if you’ve £70k to spend and want a luxury, grand tourer-type car, but since this applies to a tiny fraction of the driving public it is not really the answer, though if Tesla want to give me one (or even lend me one for a few weeks) I’d be very happy to accept their kind offer. Its worth noting that the Model-S’s large battery means charging times are much longer unless you use a Tesla supercharger station which is capable of much higher power charging, and there are a lot less of these available than any other type of charger. But as your typical journey is short this probably doesn’t matter most days.

Buy a plug in hybrid car such as the Prius Plug-in and the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV? These try to give you best of both worlds by giving you an electric car with battery/motor plus an engine and fuel tank as well, but like many other cross-overs, think amphibious cars for example, they potentially give you the worst of both worlds instead. Whether you chose to start on electric mode (approx 15 miles), drive in hybrid mode or switch to petrol mode will be dependant on whether you’re making a short journey (electric) a long one (petrol) or want maximum performance (hybrid).

Why the worst? Because you don’t buy one based on a dispassionate statistical analysis of your driving habits, if you did you’d buy a pure EV, but because they sell to people who want to try this “new electric thing” and save money/CO2 and company car tax but worry that they won’t have the flexibility that their current fossil fuel car offers them if they go full-EV. Despite this they will and do sell well and in so far as they bridge the gap they are great. They will get people used to plugging in their cars both at home and out and about, and if they find they hardly ever need to switch to petrol mode, as the majority of journeys are under 15 miles, they are much more likely to buy a pure EV next time and drop the engine/fossil fuel altogether. My negative stance really only stems from being quite happy to take the plunge straight to EV and bypass plug-in hybrid altogether.

This leads nicely to another possible way forward. A Leaf or other pure EV which comes with a removable petrol/diesel range extender (generator) would be the ideal combination, leave it at home on shorter runs and stick it in the boot for long journeys. It charges the battery as you drive extending your range considerably. Several companies are working on designing a small, powerful range extender that could be used in this way. Currently none are quickly removable so they don’t quite satisfy this ideal yet. Sure you could just buy a generator and stick it in the boot, but you’d need an exhaust pipe and a way of cooling it, and to be able to put up with the noise it makes.

What about public chargers? Well it seems that my experience of them is that they are pretty good and fairly numerous. A lot are free and even when you get charged a ridiculously high fee such as £5 (for 100 miles driving), you’re still sitting pretty. However I live in the 2015 Green Capital of Britain – Bristol and they really have had a push to install chargers everywhere so I’m having it easy. Discussions on Leaftalk forum suggest not everyone is so happy and the proliferation of EV’s and more commonly plug-ins, is placing a strain on the capacity of public chargers. However this is a teething problem and its chicken and egg, more chargers will be installed as more EV’s are sold and so on. Supermarkets are starting to install them which will really help and if the petrol retailers (many of whom are supermarkets) start putting them on their forecourts then the problem will be much less acute.

However it still takes 30 minutes or so to charge on a public rapid charger, which considering that a coffee, a visit to the loo and a catch up on emails/facebook can easily take 15-20 minutes is not ridiculous but it is a way short of the 5 minutes it takes to fill up at a petrol station. Perhaps the answer is inductive charging where a strong magnetic field or something similar wirelessly induces a current in a receiving unit in the car. This can happen at the traffic lights or when parked up, or even on the move. This is a very infrastructure-heavy solution but then so are roads for all these cars to drive on, and most main roads have electricity cabling running along them already for lights and the national grid.

Battery swap systems have been tried in Israel and this is a nice idea. Pull in to a station and a mechanised system changes your battery for a fully charged one. This works in Israel which is small and where few of the population drive out of the country but limits all vehicles to having one standard sized battery pack.

So in conclusion range with a fully battery electric vehicle, in reality, is an issue for only a few but the perception of range being too short is a problem for many. Hopefully information like this will convince more people to try it and see for themselves. This is the reason Nissan will give you a 7-day test of a Leaf, they are convinced you’ll see the light if you only give it a try.

All quiet on the EV front – operation general rant is a go

Standard

Okay so its been consistently below zero degrees Celsius here in Bristol, at least in the mornings so I have been using my other car, a 4×4 to get about. As such the EV has been taking a well earned, but chilly break in the garage.

So having the urge to write something I have decided to instead have a general rant about one particular motoring issue that causes me great consternation – mini roundabouts and a couple of other minor things.

If you are not from the UK then this might not make much sense to you but for the rest I assume there will be some sympathy.

The mini roundabout as shown heremini-roundabout

is a convenient way of connecting several small roads so that in theory each approaching stream of traffic gets a fair chance at traversing the junction and does not require any expensive lights/sensors to operate. Unlike a normal roundabout these occupy a small area and because of this they do not have kerbs in the centre or else large vehicles such as buses/HGV’s would be unable to move across them. This creates many problems as multiple vehicles can cross from multiple directions at the same time. It is clear a lot of drivers can’t cope with this “two-things-happening-at-once” situation.

So what’s the problem? Its the lack of ability of a considerable number of drivers using them to understand how they work, leading to very poor traffic flow and huge frustration from the rest of us who do appreciate the subtlety. Also and directly related to this they are a cause of a lot (possibly the most common site) for urban low speed collisions.

A full-sized roundabout operates a simple system requiring approaching drivers to look to their right and if nothing is coming around the roundabout they can go. A mini roundabout also operates this system, but, and here is the crucial and it seems often ignored difference; if three vehicles approach the roundabout and each driver looks to the vehicle on their right and decides to stay put, a paralysis occurs. Each driver potentially feels they must not go as they do not have right of way, due there being a car on their right. Nothing happens for an interminably long time, many long slow seconds, and unless someone plucks up the courage to go first placing them into the path of the vehicle to their right this “Mexican stand-off” continues. Sometimes all three drivers or the bravest two, move off at once and this can be the cause of the aforementioned collision.

The problem above is particularly acute when three people approach the roundabout and then stop unable to go because of the car to their right. However this is rarely the case. Usually as you approach there should be a natural order, the first person arriving at the roundabout is usually able to proceed across/around as any car to their right has not reached the roundabout yet.

A second and equally exasperating phenomenon occurs when one driver waiting to cross the roundabout refuses to go because there is a vehicle on the approach to their right, even if there are also vehicles coming across from the opposite side, effectively blocking the vehicles on their right from being able to proceed. In this case it is perfectly safe for them to go, and not doing so will irritate those behind them. In this case the problem is with this driver who cannot for the love of all things, see that they need to observe the other vehicles from both of the other approaches, not just the approach to their right. Failing to see this obvious connection leads right minded competent drivers to consider whether that person really ought to be driving at all. I am not asking them to factor prime numbers in their head, whilst whistling Motzart and also driving, just to see that there is a fairly simple system before them and they have to think about how it works and interact with two things, not just one.

During the rush-hour or in busy urban areas, contrary to popular belief, the road system often works more efficiently. This is due to drivers being in a hurry, being used to rush-hour conditions and due to the time of day there is a higher proportion of drivers who drive frequently and are generally more competent. It is during these conditions that “perfect” mini roundabout usage sometimes takes place. In this scenario, where cars are queued at all three approaches to the roundabout, one car goes across then the car to their right, then the car to their right and so all cars cross one after another taking one vehicle from each approach each time the cycle takes place. This is optimum and everyone gets a fair crack of the whip and traffic flows.

So please for the love of mike, if you do not understand how a mini roundabout works, take the bus or walk!

One more thing – indicators…. If there is no other vehicle that will be affected by indicating then DON’T BOTHER. Using your indicators should not be a matter of switching them on in a given situation as if by reflex, but instead they should be used where they will bring clarity not confusion. The police call this signal clutter and on an advance motorcycle course I was told by the police not to indicate unless there is a benefit. This requires intelligent, thinking-driving the exact and much more desirable opposite of “going through the motions” in a half-awake stupor.

Putting mini roundabouts aside for now as the rules for indicating here are a little different; indicator use on full sized roundabouts, by many drivers, leaves a lot to be desired. Here are some simple rules which the highway code makes perfectly clear. When approaching and turning left indicate LEFT. When approaching going straight on DO NOT indicate. When approaching going right indicate RIGHT. When leaving the roundabout INDICATE LEFT EVERY TIME as you are exiting to the left/making a left turn every time you leave a roundabout irrespective of whether you are in broader terms making a left/right turn or going straight on.

You are letting vehicles waiting to cross know that you are coming off the roundabout, and letting vehicles behind know that you are moving to the left. I see people getting all of the above wrong time and again with resulting collisions. If this is too complicated for you and if your walking shoes are not roadworthy, then consider not indicating at all on roundabouts. This is slightly annoying and carries a small risk of another vehicle pulling out in front of you but weighed against indicating the wrong way, it is considerably less dangerous.

Here are a few video examples to mull over

All that happened here is the Saxo that pulls out in front of the driver filming fails to react to the indicators of the two cars pulling off the roundabout and is indecisive or unobservant and hesitates, then deciding he/she should have gone decides to throw caution to the wind and go anyway. Accident avoided as the driver filming sees them and slows down. If you f*cked it up don’t overcompensate on your next action, just compose yourself and try again.

In this one you see the stand-off situation above, my solution here is always to go first, this is not arrogant its assertive, someone needs to get the f*ck on with it and it might as well be me, or you! It helps if you have a car that leaves the line like a stabbed rat, like my Nissan Leaf not a car where you will have to wrestle with the ageing clutch and clunky gearbox at every junction.

The other danger situation I have seen result in a fairly serious collision was the case of a car, typically being driven by a young bloke, going about 50mph in a 30 zone crossing a mini roundabout and hitting a car which pulled out in front of him. I did not stop to see the aftermath but I am certain he would have been giving it all that about “it was my right of way, you pulled out in front of me” and so forth. If you approach too fast then other drivers do not have time to see you coming and they will pull out, because when they looked it was clear. You must give others time to react to you or when you hit them it will be your fault not theirs.

Rant over – that is all.